Next.js vs React: Their Differences, and Which One to Choose

In this article, we are going to compare React and Next.JS in terms of popularity, documentation and performance. You’ll gain a useful perspective on how to choose between them, depending on the scale and intended purpose of the application you’re building.

Web technologies are constantly evolving and growing. Despite the changing JavaScript ecosystem, feedback And next.js There remain worthy choices that last a long time.

It’s likely that, as a JavaScript developer, you’ve either recently started using React or have been using it for some time, and you’re considering Next.js as well. It is essential to understand the pros and cons of each option in order to make a good choice.

We created this article in partnership subject selection, Thank you for supporting the partners who make SitePoint possible.

What is feedback?

according to official response documentation,

React is a declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It lets you build complex UIs out of small, discrete pieces of code called “components”.

It is maintained by Meta and a community of individual developers and companies. Its goal is to help developers easily build snappy user interfaces for websites and applications alike. The core concept of React is the virtual DOM, where an idealized, or “virtual”, representation of a UI is kept in memory and syncronized with the “real” DOM ​​by a library such as ReactDOM. Single-page, mobile, and server-rendered applications can be developed using React.

However, React is only concerned with managing state and rendering that state to the DOM, so building a React application usually requires some client-side functionality, along with the use of additional libraries for routing.

What is Next.js?

like this Wikipedia Next.JS introduces:

Next.js is an open-source web development framework created by Versal, which enables React-based web applications with server-side rendering and generating static websites.

Next.js gives you the best developer experience with all the features you need for production: hybrid static and server rendering, TypeScript support, smart bundling, route pre-fetching, and more. No config is needed. The React documentation lists Next.js among “recommended toolchains”, recommending it for building a server-delivered website alongside Node.js.

The main feature of NeXT.JS is the use of server-side rendering to reduce the burden on web browsers and provide better security. It uses page-based routing for developer convenience and includes support for dynamic routing. Other features include hot-module replacement, so that modules can be replaced live, automatic code splitting, which includes only the code needed to load a page, and page prefetching to reduce load times.

Next.js also supports incremental static regeneration and static site building; A compiled version of the website is usually created during build time and saved as a .next folder. When a user makes a request, a pre-rendered version – which is a static HTML page – is cached and sent to them. This makes load times very fast, but it’s not suitable for every website — such as interactive sites that change frequently and use a lot of user input.

To create professional and responsive web apps, it is recommended to use ready-made Next.js Admin Template, especially when using a new framework or library. These templates can dramatically reduce development cost and time when starting from scratch.

Materio is built on top of NeXT.JS and mui, Apart from this, it is available in both TypeScript and JavaScript versions. It’s developer-friendly, feature-rich, and has a highly customizable admin dashboard for building premium-quality, high-performance web applications such as SaaS apps, ecommerce apps, fitness apps, CRM projects, and more.

For a better overview, see mui demo,

features,

  • Built with Next.js
  • based on feedback
  • MUI built with Core V5 stable version
  • 100% React Hooks and Functional Components
  • Redux Toolkit and React Context API
  • react hook form plus yes
  • ESLint and Prettier
  • RTL (right-to-left) support
  • jwt authentication
  • dark and light layout
  • and many more

Difference Between Next.JS and React

Now, you have got enough knowledge about Next.js and React. Let us compare both the sides and list all the differences.

next.js feedback
Next is a framework for React React is a library, not a framework
You can configure almost everything not very configurable
Next is famous for server-side rendering and static generation of websites React doesn’t support server-side rendering out of the box
Web apps built using Next.js are blazing fast Web apps built using React are slower than NeXT.JS
It’s easy if you know how to react a steep learning curve
small but very dedicated community a large community of users
SEO friendly out of the box Some setup is required to make it SEO-friendly
does not require offline support offline support required
the next opinion is feedback is undeniable

Advantages and Disadvantages of React and Next.JS

After looking at the above side-by-side comparison, you probably have some idea which framework you should choose. But let’s look at the pros and cons of each framework in more detail.

Advantages and Disadvantages of React

benefits of feedback,

  • Easy to learn and easy to use
  • Uses Virtual DOM
  • have reusable components
  • SEO friendly
  • provides scalability
  • is pure abstraction
  • boasts a large and supportive community
  • Has a rich plugin ecosystem
  • Provides great developer tools

loss of response,

  • have a high rate of growth
  • lack of good documentation
  • sdk update is lagging

Advantages and Disadvantages of Next.js

Benefits of Next.js,

  • Provides image optimization
  • provides internationalization
  • have zero configuration
  • fast refresh
  • Hybrid: SSG (static-site generation) and SSR (server-side rendering)
  • API routes are
  • Provides built-in CSS support
  • supports typescript
  • Provides enhanced user experience
  • SEO friendly

Disadvantages of Next.js,

  • Have a Bad Plugin Ecosystem
  • does not have a built-in state manager
  • it is a conceptual framework
  • has file-system based routing

Which is better: Next.js or React?

It’s not a one-to-one situation, as React is a library used to build UIs, while NeXT.JS is a framework for building an entire app based on React.

Questions should always be asked in the context of the app/project requirement.

React can sometimes be more suitable than Next.js and vice versa. The following use cases will help you decide which one to use and when.

When should you use React?,

  • When you need highly dynamic routing
  • When you are already familiar with JSX
  • When you need offline support

When should you use Next.js?,

  • When You Need an All-Inclusive Framework
  • When you need server-side rendering
  • When you need a backend API endpoint

conclusion

Despite React’s popularity, Next.JS offers server-side rendering, faster loading speeds, SEO capabilities, file-based routing, API routing, and many other unique, out-of-the-box features that make it a much easier choice. Makes in many situations. You can achieve this with React – which provides more control and customizability – but it will require manual configuration.

Thanks for reading our Next.js vs React comparison. We hope you have gained a better understanding and found it easier to choose the right technology for your next application.

Leave a Reply